Sorry if that’s how the conclusion appeared to you. I don’t recall it that way. We opened up the wiki feature of the ocaml.org github repo for this purpose. AFAICT, no one made much use of it, and nothing from there was ever ported into ocaml.org. Ideas and discussion are great, but more important is that we need people to do the work. We have systematically failed to get more manpower on ocaml.org.
Related topics
Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
---|---|---|---|---|
An experimental, unofficial OCaml wiki | 24 | 4655 | April 11, 2022 | |
[ANN] New Get Started Documentation on OCaml.org | 2 | 894 | October 19, 2023 | |
V3.ocaml.org: we are live! | 23 | 3614 | May 13, 2022 | |
Modern Standard Library Documentation | 14 | 1908 | November 14, 2018 | |
Suggestions for ocaml documentation | 84 | 7051 | July 16, 2020 |