# \#ocp-indent

**URL:** https://discuss.ocaml.org/tag/ocp-indent/726.md

[Latest](https://discuss.ocaml.org/latest.md) · [Categories](https://discuss.ocaml.org/categories.md) · [Tags](https://discuss.ocaml.org/tags.md)

---

## [\[ANN\] ocp-indent 1.10.0](https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/ann-ocp-indent-1-10-0/18513)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@NathanReb](https://discuss.ocaml.org/u/NathanReb)\
**Replies:** 0\
**Last updated:** [September 7, 2026, 7:46am UTC](https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/ann-ocp-indent-1-10-0/18513 "2026-09-07T07:46:56Z")

</div>

Here at OCamlPro we’re happy to announce the release of ocp-indent.1.10.0. The full release notes are available here if you want the detailed version. The main feature of this release is the support for new OCaml langu…

---

## [Indentation of comment after variant type declaration](https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/indentation-of-comment-after-variant-type-declaration/18021)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@ysalmon](https://discuss.ocaml.org/u/ysalmon)\
**Replies:** 4\
**Last updated:** [April 28, 2026, 4:43pm UTC](https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/indentation-of-comment-after-variant-type-declaration/18021 "2026-04-28T16:43:31Z")

</div>

I am using ocp-indent with tuareg and emacs, and I am spotting a discrepancy in the way a comment after a type definition is indented. Record type definitions do not incur indentation after them, as I wish : type a = …

---

## [\[ANN\] ocp-indent 1.9.0](https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/ann-ocp-indent-1-9-0/17349)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@NathanReb](https://discuss.ocaml.org/u/NathanReb)\
**Replies:** 2\
**Last updated:** [October 7, 2025, 10:54am UTC](https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/ann-ocp-indent-1-9-0/17349 "2025-10-07T10:54:18Z")

</div>

Here at OCamlPro we’re happy to announce the (long awaited) release of ocp-indent.1.9.0. The full release notes are available here if you want the detailed version. 1.9.0 contains mostly bug fixes, better and more cons…