# Reason - general function syntax discussion

**URL:** <https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/reason-general-function-syntax-discussion/537>\
**Category:** Ecosystem\
**Tags:** reason, syntax\
**Created:** [July 12, 2017, 10:51pm UTC](https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/reason-general-function-syntax-discussion/537 "2017-07-12T22:51:07Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mars0i](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/discuss.ocaml.org/mars0i/32/1058_2.png) [@mars0i](https://discuss.ocaml.org/u/mars0i)\
**Post date:** [October 29, 2017, 3:55am UTC](https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/reason-general-function-syntax-discussion/537/62 "2017-10-29T03:55:54Z")

</div>

Thanks for all of the examples. It’s clear that my objection was misguided; it’s my eye and intuitions that aren’t properly tuned to common syntactic patterns for lambda expressions.

(In recent years I’ve been mostly using Clojure/Clojurescript, OCaml, R, and Netlogo, using Javascript and Java only when I have to do so in order to interface with my preferred languages. As a result, I haven’t had to keep up with the most recent developments. Yet.)

[Previous page](https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/reason-general-function-syntax-discussion/537.md?page=3)