I think that’s exactly right, aesthetic expectations are strongly correlated with community history, etc. But if we’re stipulating that a tracing GC is an essential aspect of some future ML, then C++ / “systems” programmers are necessarily not a target demographic given their allergy to such things, “application” programmers are. In that context, yes, parens and braces have a strong lineage, esp. via Javascript and such, but it’s hardly a unanimous requirement (again, python, ruby, and even VB remains as popular as e.g. typescript, at least according to available data).
cemerick
45
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Why did you learn OCaml? | 144 | 16280 | November 7, 2025 | |
| Advantages of OCaml over Rust | 76 | 32857 | September 4, 2019 | |
| Interesting article about ad-hoc polymorphism. An argument against modular implicits, perhaps? | 21 | 1269 | February 28, 2025 | |
| Applied numerical algebra, and type systems | 18 | 1224 | August 7, 2022 | |
| Next priority for OCaml? | 124 | 9876 | September 5, 2023 |