# Iterator-based programming vs. functional programming

**URL:** <https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/iterator-based-programming-vs-functional-programming/10064>\
**Category:** Ecosystem\
**Tags:** rust\
**Created:** [June 22, 2022, 4:42pm UTC](https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/iterator-based-programming-vs-functional-programming/10064 "2022-06-22T16:42:22Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 25

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gadmm](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/discuss.ocaml.org/gadmm/32/877_2.png) [@gadmm](https://discuss.ocaml.org/u/gadmm)\
**Post date:** [June 29, 2022, 12:11pm UTC](https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/iterator-based-programming-vs-functional-programming/10064/25 "2022-06-29T12:11:26Z")

</div>

> [@mro](#):
>
> can you link it? [https://dl.acm.org/profile/81452615666/publications?Role=author](https://dl.acm.org/profile/81452615666/publications?Role=author) doesn’t bring it up.

Like the [last time](https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/why-do-we-need-print-statments-to-write-correct-cps-continuation-passing-style-code/4437/16) that Chet mentioned Baker, he probably referred to _“ CONS should not CONS its arguments, part II: Cheney on the M.T.A.”_ / _“CONS should not CONS its arguments, or, a lazy alloc is a smart alloc”_.

Like the last time that I mentioned Baker, I referred to _“Linear Logic and Permutation Stacks–The Forth Shall Be First”_ / _“‘Use-Once’ Variables and Linear Objects–Storage Management, Reflection and Multi-Threading”_

Baker’s website appears to be down but there is an archive [here](https://plover.com/~mjd/misc/hbaker-archive/ohome.html) if you want to read them in HTML form.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/iterator-based-programming-vs-functional-programming/10064)._