# Is caqti doc missing? **URL:** \ **Category:** Ecosystem\ **Created:** [January 26, 2026, 9:12pm UTC](https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/is-caqti-doc-missing/17741 "2026-01-26T21:12:31Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 6\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![mostafatouny](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/discuss.ocaml.org/mostafatouny/32/5826_2.png) [@mostafatouny](https://discuss.ocaml.org/u/mostafatouny)\ **Post date:** [January 26, 2026, 9:12pm UTC](https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/is-caqti-doc-missing/17741/1 "2026-01-26T21:12:31Z")
Hello, I used to rely on caqti’s documentation in [ocaml’s website](https://ocaml.org/p/caqti). Now I get “No Docs” ![Screenshot_2026-01-26_23-10-15](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/uploads/ocaml/original/2X/1/113b069ae595e85104c53043a1d9456137af5694.png) I checked caqti’s [github repo](https://github.com/paurkedal/ocaml-caqti/) and it still links to ocaml’s website as the _API Documentation for Stable Releases_. Any thoughts? ---
**Author:** ![yawaramin](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/discuss.ocaml.org/yawaramin/32/3384_2.png) [@yawaramin](https://discuss.ocaml.org/u/yawaramin)\ **Post date:** [January 26, 2026, 9:23pm UTC](https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/is-caqti-doc-missing/17741/2 "2026-01-26T21:23:42Z")
See [Packages on https://ocaml.org/ return a 404 for docs only · Issue #3461 · ocaml/ocaml.org · GitHub](https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml.org/issues/3461) ---
**Author:** ![mooreryan](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/discuss.ocaml.org/mooreryan/32/2843_2.png) [@mooreryan](https://discuss.ocaml.org/u/mooreryan)\ **Post date:** [January 26, 2026, 10:03pm UTC](https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/is-caqti-doc-missing/17741/3 "2026-01-26T22:03:49Z")
It’s not the answer to your question, but let me just take a minute to suggest [odig](https://erratique.ch/software/odig), which allows you to browse API docs locally for packages installed in your switch. It makes for such a great doc reading experience, in my opinion. ---
**Author:** ![jonludlam](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/discuss.ocaml.org/jonludlam/32/101_2.png) [@jonludlam](https://discuss.ocaml.org/u/jonludlam)\ **Post date:** [January 27, 2026, 12:42am UTC](https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/is-caqti-doc-missing/17741/4 "2026-01-27T00:42:44Z")
Apologies for the disruption in the docs - they should be back now, at least to the same state they were a few days ago. We had some breakage recently and in fixing it I inadvertantly switched the live docs site to the still-in-progress builds, so only a few packages had docs. While the build is going on we won’t be getting docs for new packages, meaning more-or-less anything merged to opam-repository since mid December. When the current build finishes I’ll switch it back and then we’ll have refreshed solutions for all the package builds and we’ll be tracking the latest opam-repository, so new packages should get their docs within an hour or so of them being merged to opam-repository. ---
**Author:** ![mostafatouny](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/discuss.ocaml.org/mostafatouny/32/5826_2.png) [@mostafatouny](https://discuss.ocaml.org/u/mostafatouny)\ **Post date:** [January 27, 2026, 8:24am UTC](https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/is-caqti-doc-missing/17741/5 "2026-01-27T08:24:29Z")
Thank you @yawaramin and @mooreryan. I confirm the docs are functioning now, @jonludlam. Thank you. ---
**Author:** ![avsm](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/discuss.ocaml.org/avsm/32/6_2.png) [@avsm](https://discuss.ocaml.org/u/avsm)\ **Post date:** [January 27, 2026, 10:18am UTC](https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/is-caqti-doc-missing/17741/6 "2026-01-27T10:18:50Z")
> [@jonludlam](#): > > We had some breakage recently and in fixing it I inadvertantly switched the live docs site to the still-in-progress builds, so only a few packages had docs. I found Jon’s blog notes about [how he fixed the docs build](https://jon.recoil.org/blog/2026/01/weeknotes-2026-03.html#ocaml-docs-ci) to be quite useful in understanding how this infrastructure worked!