Not really, there is a rule about package usefullness and another for naming which formally are pretty subjective subjects.
That’s just to say that in the end it’s up to the people managing the repo to decide what they want it to be, perhaps influenced via community input, or not (but of course what they decide could affect their funding support).
It should also be mentioned that you can be part of these people.
P.S. Just to make clear, while my name is on the list I linked earlier I do not participate in the repository’s management/policy.